When you take the red pill, sometimes small little facts of life click, and make you see things in a totally new way. One of the biggest red pill truths is femininsts love radical Islam. Radical Islam is similar to how the Nazi’s blended the far left and the far right. Always in public school, I had been been taught that Nazis were simply radical conservative extremists, along with all Fascists, but this wasn’t true.
The truth, which they don’t teach you in school, is that the National Socialists took elements of Germany’s traditional Right, including a centuries-old desire to unify Germany, and melded this with a radical Left ideology–an ideology which was very similar to the Marxism of Soviet Russia.
Muslim extremists are the Nazis of today, and likewise we don’t realize the melding of Left and Right that is going on. Occasionally, glimpses peek through the mainstream media’s gatekeepers. But few can fully answer, what motivates these terrorists? Why do they hate us? Is it our fault?
People who have escaped the extremist regions tell a much different story than what the media portrays. We imagine captive women who hide behind veils and are beaten if they dare speak a word. But then we see the prominent role of women in many of the terrorist attacks–the women who led the Paris attacks, the woman who radicalized the San Bernadino attacker, etc. If you look at specific cases of terrorism, the role of women are actually not very conservative.
A few years ago, Sarah El Deeb of the Associated Press exposed the true role of women in radical Islam. Instead of sordid stories of child brides and rape, she told the story of “a paid honeymoon in caliphate’s heart.” A couple meets online and enjoys a romantic honeymoon eating ice cream and dining at restaurants.
Wait. So are you telling me they are progressive? They can safely scroll through online matches like girls do here? They have “a generous welfare system” for women? Couples receive “$500 when they marry to help them start a family”?
A new picture opens up. The social engineering in radical Islam actually resembles Soviet Russia more than it does Christianity or traditional European culture, with state efforts to increase reproduction and promote social stability. Maybe young men join ISIS because they see macho bad-boys fighting against big powers, changing the world–much like Antifa and other Leftist groups behave–and it is an easy ways to procure a bride and be respected as a man.
Did I hear that right, ISIS has a welfare program? Yes. How progressive of radical Islam. Many Leftists here are attracted by the same kind of thing, like the monthly allowance for groceries, dependency on the state, and ‘public assistance’ for the ‘poor.’ New York Post reports women receive $25 per month per child, plus a $400 bonus up front to be a mother and $500 to receive a partner.
Suddenly it is not such a mystery why ISIS women do not seem concerned that their sons and husbands are out killing themselves. You would think they would want to stop the men from killing themselves if they love them. But it’s government money. That’s what it comes down to. A Western woman in ISIS wrote, ““U dnt hav 2 pay 4 ANYTHING if u r wife of a shaheed,” the Post reports.
But most of all, I think the women of ISIS are attracted to the brutal and strong caliphate that radical Islam offers, a beast that they can follow. I think this applies to the “strong-willed” women more than anyone. They are attracted by a strong brutal ideology, which is what Socialism is. I guarantee, if you talk to any of the women of ISIS, they will tell you their strict ideology is liberating for women. They will use the same words feminists use.
This also explains why feminists in the United States rail endlessly against Christian expectations for women to dress nicely yet have not a word to say about women in the Middle East who are banned from driving and are not allowed to reveal their faces in public. Why don’t feminists ever talk about the ISIS mistreatment of women? Why? They respect the movement’s brutal ideology, that’s why. Feminists love the strong hand and radical Islam provides it.
The only thing they have to reconcile the pieces of traditional culture that get melded in. But the National Socialists could handle that. So can today’s feminists.
Now, there is enormous danger in cherry-picking pieces of traditional culture and plastering them to an untraditional ideology, as both ISIS and Leftists do. It quickly leads to extremism. Modernism brought the dangerous ideology of Social Justice many decades ago, and now today, post-Modernism is today’s effort to meld pieces of traditional culture with it–with the accompanying movements such as Deconstructionalism to help.
So we see the same kind of dynamic in today’s Left.
Feminists are very discriminating about the women they defend. They have nothing to say about the rape gangs, mutilation, and sexual slavery in radical Islam controled areas. Likewise, women in ISIS don’t care much about the rape and mutilation so rampant in their culture. They also have little to say about men and boys who die and fall victim to the wiles of progressive culture in America. But they sure do complain about the toxic masculinity among Western Christians, echoing the same words as Karl Marx and Osama Bin Laden.