A Truthful Review of Everything Your Father Never Taught You

Kindle Customer wrote a truthful review of Everything Your Father Never Taught You:

I always hated the saying that women are complicated or a mystery because they are people. It sounds like a lie. This book confirmed things I knew and explained everything I was still trying to figure out.
Anyone wanting to become “Chad” and avoid “Giselle” should read this.

Thank you to Kindle Customer for writing a truthful review of Everything Your Father Never Taught You.  When people who read my books write honest reviews it helps to grow Redgulls because it helps improve Everything Your Father Never Taught You in Amazon’s search ratings.  SJW’s leave dishonest fake reviews because many people never look past the book rating and if they see a low star book rating they reject the book.  The other reason why SJW’s leave fake reviews is because books with low star ratings get punished on Amazon’s ratings system and are less likely to appear on people’s Amazon book searches.  Whenever people write a truthful review of a product that they bought on Amazon then they help to improve that product’s rating which helps more people to find it.

I am very grateful to Kindle Customer for writing a truthful review of Everything Your Father Never Taught You.

If Western Civilization Refuses to Repent There Is No Bottom to How Low It Will Fall

I try to be an optimistic man.  I honestly believe that Western Civilization will survive the mess that we are in.  I believe that eventually the American people and the European people will repent of their sins and turn away from them.  However in dark moments I wonder what if we don’t repent?  I wonder is there a  bottom level Western Civilization can fall to and won’t descend any lower?  When I read the end of the Book of Mormon one of the things that sticks out to me is there isn’t a bottom to how low Western Civilzation can fall and in many ways we are getting really low.

9 And notwithstanding this great abomination of the Lamanites, it doth not exceed that of our people in Moriantum. For behold, many of the daughters of the Lamanites have they taken prisoners; and after depriving them of that which was most dear and precious above all things, which is chastity and virtue

10 And after they had done this thing, they did murder them in a most cruel manner, torturing their bodies even unto death; and after they have done this, they devour their flesh like unto wild beasts, because of the hardness of their hearts; and they do it for a token of bravery.  (Mosiah 9:9-10).

The story Mormon tells in these two verses is beyond horrific.  Let’s translate these words into modern English to see the horrifying nature of what the Nephites were up to and just how pathetic the Nephites were.

Some Nephites went and captured some Lamanite girls.  It doesn’t say that how old these girls were.  The image that we have in our head is of the Nephite capturing something like late teens to early 20’s Lamanite girls.  However one of the things we’ve learned over the last year is when a society descends into pure decadence the wickedest people acquire a taste for small children.  The truth is the Lamanite girls who the Nephites captured were probably little girls no older than 7 or 8 years old.

After kidnapping these little girls from the Lamanites the Nephite warriors put the girls through systemic rape and torture.  From the disgust Mormon writes with, it’s safe to say that it wasn’t a short process.  These Nephites dragged out the rape and torture of these Lamanite little girls for as long as they could keep them alive.  Then after raping and torturing these girls until they died the evil Nephite men ate their flesh raw.

And here’s the kicker, these evil Nephites kidnapped, raped, tortured, murdered and cannibalized little Lamanite girls as a token of bravery.  These evil Nephite men didn’t go after and kill the toughest Lamanite warriors as a symbol of how tough and brave they were.  No they went after little freaking girls who never harmed anybody and chose them as their tokens of bravery.

One of life’s ugliest truths is there is no bottom to the level of evil humans will descend to.  When people take the slide down the slippery slope of sin and degeneracy one of the things they will find is the slide has no bottom.  Always there is something worse that humans will do to each other and even worse there will be somebody willing to celebrate it and justify it.

In the modern world the SJW’s will never stop pushing more and more evil onto our civilization.  They’ve normalized and sanctified homosexuality.  They’ve normalized Transgenderism and are teaching the youth to have a dysfunctional view of their sex.  The elites in Western Civilization are already starting the process of normalizing pedophilia.  If they get their way on pedophilia (and they will sooner that we want to believe if the American people don’t repent soon) then they will look to normalize something even worse.  What will it be?  I really have no clue.  Maybe it will be something about it being ok to traffic foreign children as long as the children “consent” whatever that means.

The only way to stop Western Civilization’s slide into depravity that can’t even be imagined yet is for the Western people to repent of their sins and turn away from them.  If Western Civilization doesn’t repent then we can expect to see depravity at a level of the last days of the Nephites probably within our lifetime.  And we all know what happened to the Nephites when they got that wicked and the same thing will happen to Western Civilization when we get that wicked.

Make sure to leave a comment on this article below.

Read the first neomasculine book written for Mormons today


Did Elder D. Todd Christofferson Take the Red Pill?

Elder D. Todd Christofferson gave a very interesting talk in April 2017 LDS General Conference where he called out American (Mormon?) elites for supporting degeneracy and the breakdown of the family while in their private lives they live relatively traditional lives.  Elder D. Todd Christofferson said that western elites need to preach what they practice.  After his April 2016 LDS General Conference talk many red pill Mormons started to wonder if Elder D. Todd Christofferson took the red pill.

Elder D. Todd Christofferson LDS General Conference talks highlights

Let’s take a look at some of Elder D. Todd Christofferson’s General Conference talks.

  1. Elder D. Todd Christofferson’s April 2017 General Conference talk was titled The Voice of Warning– This talk was a call to repentance.  It is very red pill and calls out the elites for encouraging the breakup of the family while they live in complete families.  That section could have come right out of Steve Sailor’s mouth.

The Key Quote is:

Sometimes those who raise a warning voice are dismissed as judgmental. Paradoxically, however, those who claim truth is relative and moral standards are a matter of personal preference are often the same ones who most harshly criticize people who don’t accept the current norm of “correct thinking.” One writer referred to this as the “shame culture”:

“In a guilt culture you know you are good or bad by what your conscience feels. In a shame culture you know you are good or bad by what your community says about you, by whether it honors or excludes you. … [In the shame culture,] moral life is not built on the continuum of right and wrong; it’s built on the continuum of inclusion and exclusion. …

“… Everybody is perpetually insecure in a moral system based on inclusion and exclusion. There are no permanent standards, just the shifting judgment of the crowd. It is a culture of oversensitivity, overreaction and frequent moral panics, during which everybody feels compelled to go along. … 

“The guilt culture could be harsh, but at least you could hate the sin and still love the sinner. The modern shame culture allegedly values inclusion and tolerance, but it can be strangely unmerciful to those who disagree and to those who don’t fit in.

Contrasted to this is “the rock of our Redeemer,” a stable and permanent foundation of justice and virtue. How much better it is to have the unchanging law of God by which we may act to choose our destiny rather than being hostage to the unpredictable rules and wrath of the social media mob. How much better it is to know the truth than to be “tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine.” How much better to repent and rise to the gospel standard than to pretend there is no right or wrong and languish in sin and regret.

Elder D. Todd Christofferson’s April 2017 General Conference talk is very much a red pill talk.  You could go so far as to say that he’s been listening to the Weimerica Weekely podcast and been reading Socialmatter.net and some Steve Sailor.

Elder D. Todd Christofferson’s October 2016 talk was titled Abide in My Love– and talked about how Heavenly Father has a great love for us however having access to his love is conditional on us obeying the commandments, accepting the Atonement  and giving up our sins.

The key quote is:

God’s love is infinite and it will endure forever, but what it means for each of us depends on how we respond to His love.

Jesus said:

“As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you: continue ye in my love.

“If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father’s commandments, and abide in his love.

To “continue in” or “abide in” the Savior’s love means to receive His grace and be perfected by it.  To receive His grace, we must have faith in Jesus Christ and keep His commandments, including repenting of our sins, being baptized for the remission of sins, receiving the Holy Ghost, and continuing in the path of obedience.

It’s a general call to repentance.  The big deal is how Elder D. Todd Christofferson mentions that if we want to live in God’s love then we have to repent and give up our sins.  We can’t live in God’s love in our sins.  It very much goes against the Current Year narrative that we can live however we want to live and Heavenly Father will accept us and be happy with us no matter what we do.  It’s very out of step with Current Year philosophy and I’d declare it a red pill talk.

Elder D. Todd Christofferson’s April 2016 LDS General Conference talk was titled Fathers – It is a talk about the importance of fathers.  Everything in it is accurate but he misses the point that it isn’t men blowing up families these days, its women.  Yes the breakdown of the family comes from no fathers in the home but that’s because women have kicked the men out of the home.  This is very much a blue bill talk.  It’s possible that Elder D. Todd Christofferson knows more than he’s letting on in this talk or that this talk led him to explore some “darker” parts of the internet.  On the other hand, maybe he’s on to something.  After all you can’t have patriarchy without patriarchs.

Elder D. Todd Christofferson understands that fathers are the ones who make a family work but that’s standard for the Apostles.  Like most men of his generation his talk indicates that he doesn’t understand the true nature of women for good and bad.

Elder D. Todd Christofferson’s October 2015 LDS general Conference talk was titled: Why the Church–  and it talks about the importance of being part of the church and the need for being part of the LDS community.  Elder D. Todd Christofferson talks about how being part of the church is a big part of building a successful community.  This talk indicates that he understands the basics of SCALE.  I’d declare this talk red pill.

The key quote is:

Key quote: How does His Church accomplish the Lord’s purposes? It is important to recognize that God’s ultimate purpose is our progress. His desire is that we continue “from grace to grace, until [we receive] a fullness  of all He can give. That requires more than simply being nice or feeling spiritual. It requires faith in Jesus Christ, repentance, baptism of water and of the Spirit, and enduring in faith to the end.  One cannot fully achieve this in isolation, so a major reason the Lord has a church is to create a community of Saints that will sustain one another in the “strait and narrow path which leads to eternal life.”

So far most of Elder D. Todd Christofferson’s talks show that he is generally a man who understands red pill concepts.  He understands that American communities are broken and that living in broken communities leads to dis- function.  He understands that the Mormon Church is one of the few organizations that can provide people things that they need like a stable community of likeminded people.

Elder D. Todd Christofferson’s April 2015 LDS General Conference talk was titled: Why Marriage, Why Family– It discusses how marriage is a responsibility from Heavenly Father and it isn’t just about love and happily ever after.  This is very much a red pill talk.

The key quote is:

A family built on the marriage of a man and woman supplies the best setting for God’s plan to thrive—the setting for the birth of children, who come in purity and innocence from God, and the environment for the learning and preparation they will need for a successful mortal life and eternal life in the world to come. A critical mass of families built on such marriages is vital for societies to survive and flourish. That is why communities and nations generally have encouraged and protected marriage and the family as privileged institutions. It has never been just about the love and happiness of adults.

The social science case for marriage and for families headed by a married man and woman is compelling.   And so “we warn that the disintegration of the family will bring upon individuals, communities, and nations the calamities foretold by ancient and modern prophets.”  But our claims for the role of marriage and family rest not on social science but on the truth that they are God’s creation. It is He who in the beginning created Adam and Eve in His image, male and female, and joined them as husband and wife to become “one flesh” and to multiply and replenish the earth.  Each individual carries the divine image, but it is in the matrimonial union of male and female as one that we attain perhaps the most complete meaning of our having been made in the image of God—male and female. Neither we nor any other mortal can alter this divine order of matrimony. It is not a human invention. Such marriage is indeed “from above, from God” and is as much a part of the plan of happiness as the Fall and the Atonement.

Telling post modern Americans that marriage isn’t happily ever after and that marriage isn’t all about love and “being happy” is something most post modern Americans don’t want to hear.  Telling Americans that marriage is about giving children a good environment to grow and telling Americans that marriage is about personal sacrifice is very much a red pill act.

Elder D. Todd Christofferson’s October 2014 LDS General Conference talk is titled: Free Forever, to Act for Themselves–  and talks about repentance and that God won’t save us in our sins.  We are free to choose to be obedient or be disobedient but God cannot save us in our sins.

Christ died not to save indiscriminately but to offer repentance. We rely “wholly upon the merits of him who is mighty to save” in the process of repentance, but acting to repent is a self-willed change. So by making repentance a condition for receiving the gift of grace, God enables us to retain responsibility for ourselves. Repentance respects and sustains our moral agency: “And thus mercy can satisfy the demands of justice, and encircles them in the arms of safety, while he that exercises no faith unto repentance is exposed to the whole law of the demands of justice; therefore only unto him that has faith unto repentance is brought about the great and eternal plan of redemption.”

Telling the American people that they need to repent of their sins is very much a red pill act, especially during the Obama years when the US Federal Government had a gun pointed at the LDS Church’s head.  Telling Americans to repent is a very red pill thing to do.  Is Elder D. Todd Christofferson Common Filth’s grandfather?

Elder D. Todd Christofferson’s October 2013 General Conference talk was titled: The Moral Force of Women–  It praises women and says that women are a natural force for good.  He then goes on to talk about all of the important tasks that women do.  Talks about how the world minimizes the value of women.  Talks about how sexual immorality makes women degenerate.  He talks about how the world is trying to destroy femininity.  When you get past the woman worship at the beginning the talk is very red pill.  The pattern is he is very red pill but he has a bit of a blind spot when it comes to women.

Jumping back in time, Elder D. Todd Christofferson’s October 2010 LDS General Conference talk was titled: Reflections on a Consecrated Life– It talks about living a balanced life.  The talk is very red pill.

The key quote was: I would like to consider with you five of the elements of a consecrated life: purity, work, respect for one’s physical body, service, and integrity.

Exercising and living a balanced life is very much a red pill concept.  Most Americans are fat, lazy degenerates who live pathetic lives.  Just telling Americans that they need to live productive lives in all aspect of life is an incredibly red pill concept.


In most regards Elder D. Todd Christofferson is a red pill Mormon.  He has a bit of a blind spot when it comes to women.  A good man to compare him to is William S. Lind who is a well known 4GW theorist.  William S. Lind is a traditionalist and is red pill in all matters except women.  Elder D. Todd Christoffeson is very much the same way.

One of the great things about being a member of the LDS Church is we have leaders who are fairly red pilled.  Very few religious institutions are fortunate enough to have leaders like Elder D. Todd Christofferson because most religious leaders are total cuck sellouts.  Just look at the post modern Pope for an example of a religious leader who sold out his flock.  It is a sign of the authority of the Apostles that we have more or less red pill men like Elder D. Todd Christofferson because it shows that God is guiding the Mormon Church through the cultural collapse and showing us how not to decay like the rest of Western Civilization.

Make sure to leave a comment on this article below.

Read the first neomasculine book written for Mormons today


The American Girls Dressed Up As Fake Las Vegas Showgirls Outside the Bellagio

Mrs. Johnson and I decided to take a road trip to Southern California and the Southwest.  We stopped for a couple of nights in Las Vegas because Vegas.  We were walking down by the Bellagio Fountain and there were all of these people in popular costumes who you could pay some cash and take your picture with them.  You could take your picture with Pikachu, Dark Vader, Spiderman, etc.  There also was a pair of American girls dressed up as Las Vegas Showgirls with the high heels, skimpy outfit and that huge palm leaf decoration going over their head.

Most of the people in costumes were hustling to get people to notice them and want to take a picture with them.  Dark Vader was looking scary and he had the breathing thing going to give it the authentic look.  Pikachu was waving to the few kids around and making sure to get in front of all nerdy type people.  Everybody was busting their butts to get their photo taken and earn their keep, except the girls dressed as Las Vegas Showgirls.

The American girls dressed up as Las Vegas showgirls were just staring at their cell phones looking distracted and uninterested.  There they were looking hot and sexy with their eye balls glued to their phones while they were on the job.  They looked so many girls in night clubs these days.  You know the look?  Girls dressed to the max, sitting or standing in a tight circle with their girl friends, not letting anyone talk to them and taking the occasional selfie.  Any American man who’s been to a night club within the last 7 years knows the look only too well.

How were they going to get men to be brave enough to want a picture with them?  Tons of men have suffered major blowouts from American women who couldn’t get out of their phones long enough to pay them even a minimum amount of social courtesy.  Those girls dressed up as Las Vegas showgirls were looking like the lead up to bad meeting girls experiences so many American men have suffered over the years.  What man is going to walk up to one of those girls dressed up like Las Vegas showgirls and say, hey can I pay you $5 for a photo?  How horrible of a rejection would it be for men to go up to girls who in theory are working, offer to give them work and then have the girls not bother to respond?

The girls outside the Bellagio dressed as Las Vegas showgirls who couldn’t be bothered to get out of their phones is a great example of the self entitled nature many American women have.  These girls were working and they didn’t feel that they had to put in any effort into their jobs.  Either those girls or the guy who they work for were paying the Bellagio or (more likely) some member of the mafia for the right to work on that corner.  Did those girls care that they had a job to do and that if somebody didn’t get their rent, then there would be big problems for them?  Did those girls care that for them to be successful and to earn a ton of money on that spot, what they needed to do was be very friendly with everybody and especially welcoming to the men.  The American girls dressed up as Las Vegas showgirls had the horrible American woman attribute of having no interest or concern about men even on a business level.

It’s a tragic social commentary to see how so many American women can’t even pretend to treat men well, even when it’s literally their job to pretend to treat men well.  It’s sad to see women who are so deeply connected to their cell phones that they can’t even focus on their incredibly simple jobs and life tasks.  It really makes you wonder just how lower American women can go.

Make sure to leave a comment on this article below.

Read the first neomasculine book written for Mormons today

Defending Trump: What Would A Leftist Do?

If regular Americans want to take America back they need to ask themselves what would a leftist do?  The left has had non stop success taking over America for the last 100 years and the only way to take our country back is by using their tactics.  Asking: “What would a leftist do?” and copying their tactics allows us to form a plan to take our country back step by step.

Now what I am about to say may be slightly controversial:

His Imperial Majesty Donald J. Trump is not perfect.

He is not even Alt-right!

He is a at best a fiscal conservative Civic-Nationalist.

He proudly waved an LGBT’s for Trump flag at one of his rallies. A social conservative he is not.

The God Emperor is not the living re-incarnation of Augusto Pinochet that the Alt-Right fantasizes about.

Not quite yet kids…

And he will make mistakes!

So when he makes mistakes – what do we do?

Disavow him?

Backtrack our support, saying we were never really too sure about him to begin with?

Do we start wondering if Glenn Beck and Mitt Romney were right?

Go crying to our liberal co-workers that we were duped by a Fascist Trojan horse and start attending Antifa indoctrination seminars?


We do none of those things, because he is possessed of the one redeeming feature that will cover all of his political sins:

He’s not Hillary!


Only four months in, and we are forgetting how big this is.

If only for that reason alone he deserves our support!

We need to adopt the mindset that every tiny step to the Right is a Victory.

With a capital “V”!

We need to remember that this is a long game – one of inches not yards. We need to keep gathering what in competitive chess they call “The accumulation of small advantages”. It is the theory that if you go after and get every tiny advantage/victory that you can, before long you have an overwhelming position that will enable you to utterly defeat your opponent.

The mindset we must have is one of inching towards daylight: We are in a deep dark cave of SJW Socialist despair. But so long as we keep taking the tunnel on the Right, even if it is only moving us inches at a time, we can one day walk out into the warm sunlight of freedom.

So every  step that America takes to the Right should be celebrated like a Ferrari victory at the Monza Grand Prix.

Tired of winning yet?


And we already have cause to celebrate because of Trump’s campaign promises:

He is actually trying to fulfill them!

Judge Neil Gorsuch is now on the Supreme Court. (Not a Liberal!)

He’s cracking down on the border – he’s making the RINO’s build the wall kicking and screaming.

In spite of waving the LGBT’s for Trump flag, he reversed The Kenyan’s executive order on allowing trannies into ladies restrooms!

And the Muslim travel ban is going to make a comeback!

This is just a tiny list. The fact that he is making a good faith effort to fulfill all his promises should be reason enough to give him the benefit of the doubt when he does stumble.

He really is trying to make America Great Again!

He may make mistakes, but he does have a good track record for learning from them.

So when he does make a mistake the first thing we need to do is circle the wagons, tell the Leftists to suck it, and continue to push Trump to the Right!

The left is trying to create a narrative of despair – to drive a wedge between Trump and his supporters. Their only hope of preventing a 2020 Trumpslide is to try and twist every word and action into some type of betrayal of his promises to the American people.

That is why it is important to continually tell the Left and the rest of the world just how Perfect and Awesome Trump is.

Because that is what the Liberals in the (((Mainstream Media))) did for the last Eight years under the Kenyan administration.


Even now they are actively trying to cement his legacy as one of the greatest Presidents of all time:

They will continue to push this “He’s the Greatest” narrative in spite of  indisputable  “Alternative Facts” from U.S. governments own bureaucracy:

The Kenyan was a complete disaster, but the (((Main Stream Media ))) Left told us for EIGHT YEARS that everything was fine, and that the world was just getting better and better – no matter what he did!


Why would the Left continually push the Lie that the Kenyan was a great president in spite of all the facts and evidence to the contrary?


Well, Trump is our “Guy”, and we have to show the Leftists that they have no where to drive their socialist wedges.

We need to dominate and control the greater narrative to keep the Liberals on the back foot so that they keep overreacting in the most hysterical manner possible, destroying their own credibility in the process.

So how do we keep them on the defensive? What would a leftist do?  We need to keep triggering them like there’s no tomorrow.

We know that the Left does not argue in good faith. We know that if we try to argue by using logic and facts, giving their ideas a fair hearing before replying with our considered rebuttal; that this is a losing strategy.

Conservatives have been doing this for decades, and this is what we got:

Brought to you by the tireless efforts of the RNC.

The time for Losing is over. It’s time to fight fire with fire and  start putting marks in the win column.

What we need to do is ask ourselves: “WWALD” What Would A Leftist Do?
Hint: The other side is always Wrong! Spin! Attack! Ridicule! Shame! Accuse!

Say we find ourselves in a social situation where SJW’s are in attendance. A political discussion ensues and the game of Liberal “gotcha!” begins.

A Leftist may point out a perfectly legitimate mistake that Trump has made: “See, look at that, surely you don’t think that is right? Right?”

Stop right there! Whatever you do do not agree with them. We need to pause, take a deep breath. Wait a moment. Think.

And ask ourselves – WWALD: What Would A Leftist Do…

“What are you talking about? Can’t you see he is trying to save the country from Fascists and Make America Great Again! Are you a Nazi? A FAKE American?”

Give them nothing.




Mormon Church Universities and Utah Dominate 100 Most Conservative Universities in America

When it comes to universities that promote traditional values, Mormon Church universities and Utah public universities are leading the way.  Of the 100 most conservative universities Utah and the Mormon Church universities take 6 of the top 100 spots and even better Utah and Mormon Church universities are 5 of the top 50 most conservative universities.

Here’s a list of the 100 most conservative universities in the United States:

Utah schools: Weber State University (83), SUU (43), Utah State University (28),

Mormon schools: BYU-H (35), BYU (4), BYU-I (2)

Congrats to BYU for coming in number 4 and BYU-I for coming in number 2.  The state of Utah in general did very well where all the major universities besides the University of Utah and UVU finished in the top 100.  One of the sad places where the University of Utah really needs to improve is in purging leftist elements at the “U.”  Sadly the leftists in Utah love to congregate at the “U,” and this isn’t going to change anytime soon.  What is really tragic is UVU isn’t in the top 100 most conservative universities in the United States.  What is going on at UVU?  UVU is in Utah County, gets funded by rich California Mormons who want their children to be able to attend university in Utah where they can get a traditional education.  The Mormons sending their kids to UVU aren’t getting good value for their money because they could send their kids to Utah State instead.

The Mormon Church is working hard to give Mormon youth a traditional college education.  The 3 universities in the BYU system: BYU, BYU-Idaho and BYU-Hawaii are some of the highest ranked conservative universities in America and it shows that Mormon Church leaders want LDS youth to have a traditional college experience.  Yes, SJW fake Mormons are trying to take over BYU.  However for all of its problems BYU still is one of the best conservative universities in America and one of the few places where parents can send their children to receive a traditional education.

Make sure to leave a comment on this article below.

Read the first neomasculine book written for Mormons today

Diablo Valley College Professor Eric Clanton Indoctrinates Students With Marxism

Diablo Valley College in California is under fire over one of their teachers, Eric Clanton. Internet sleuths claim he attacked peaceful Trump supporters with a bike lock.  Diablo Valley College’s student newspaper reported he is not currently teaching, but confirmed that he indeed “was scheduled to return to work for the summer semester.” The school complained that he is the “subject of 4chan harassment” and that the claims of violence are “based on an unsubstantiated allegation from unknown sources.”

Also, an alleged friend of Clanton’s denied the allegations of violence.

Marxist Agitators

I do not know whether Eric Clanton is the culprit or not, but while investigating I uncovered a lot of disturbing information about schools in this area. It paints a very grim picture of Marxist indoctrination in California schools.

The SFSU academic profile for Clanton listed Marxism and Environmental Virtue Ethics as his interests. An OKCupid dating profile that the sleuths associate with Clanton states: “I spend a lot of time thinking about REVOLUTION”

A video is going around of a lecture about “creative forms of resistance.” It is unconfirmed who is giving this lecture or where.

As a feeder school for UC Berkeley, these allegations fit into a troubling pattern of extreme Marxism that leads to violence and suppression of free speech. A Berkeley teacher got caught instigating violence. A middle school teacher at Berkeley city got caught instigating violence. Berkeley’s school newspaper is supporting violence.

As for what is being taught at DVC, I found only a couple lectures online. But they contain some very disturbing Marxist ideology.

Indoctrination Of Sexual Degeneracy

The title of this lecture by family therapist Grace Pacheco is: “Polyamory and Conscious Non-Monogamy in Couple’s of Color Diablo Valley College DVC.” The giggly woman makes some very racist generalizations that would provoke outrage in other contexts, such as that Baptists grow up in “the hood” while Whites have supportive parents.

“Polyamory is another marginalized culture, because the Untied States was built on Christian values–one man, one woman together, only like that…. It’s really an ethical and responsible way to be.”

Ethical huh?

“Non-monogamy rejects religious rules put in place by Christian slave owners, settlers, and Conquistadors. You know, the theory is that, actually, if we look back, yeah maybe I grew up Christian, you know, in an Evangelical church, maybe in the hood in a Baptist church. It’s basically saying, ‘Wait a second, why am I believing this stuff? But my ancestors–this isn’t really my religion, so I’m going to reject that.’

‘Catholicism–I mean I was always like this in church, but isn’t that like the slave-owners’ religion?’ Okay, so this is where it’s rebellion, it’s revolution, of being polyamorous.

So basically it is a deliberate reflection on how we can actively challenge patriarchy, meaning no longer man owns me. I am not his “chick.” We’re partners on the same playing field.”

Partners? I think a better word would be “comrade.” This is Marxist ideology, after all. Marxism is rebellion against private ownership and removal of personal responsibilities, which are an evil product of Christianity and men. Her narrative about romance portrays traditional marriage somehow as ownership and somehow related to slavery. She portrays relationships as an economic commodity that one person should not be responsible for.

This is sexual Marxism.

“And then also, it rejects the racism able-ism and power and balance in relationships. So, like I said, polyamory is not a fetish.”

As a product of Marxist society, relationships now must conform into its societal rules of class. Relationships are now defined by class.

Diablo Valley College’s Libraray twitter stream

Diablo Valley College’s Newspaper twitter stream

This ideology becomes incredibly convoluted, as everybody wants to be an oppressed class and get away from the undesirable classes, like White and male. Suddenly there are hundreds, thousands, of classes that we have to juggle. Add multiple partners on top of that, and the formula for “privilege” becomes quite complex, like I imagine tax returns will be in another hundred years.

She shows a complex double-wheel graph of class distinctions:

“So, this is areas of privilege, powerlessness, oppression, and internationality… So, in every single area you can be privileged or you can be like totally oppressed and not privileged….

Candice and Mike both identify as Black. JP is a White man. Okay, we’ve got a problem there. We’ve got a power differential, right, to bring in a person with that much power in the world? Now, Mike has no privilege in–I’m going to say no–it’s just what it is–being a Black male. However, as religious, he identified as Christian which is considered an advantageous religion. Okay, he’s not Black Muslim–that would be harder, meaning more oppression.”

So they break up. The end.

Indoctrination Of Racial Marxism

This lecture from the “Diablo Valley College Speaker Series” is titled “Race, Equity, Justice, and Education.”

The logic here is just as simplistic and twisted. He focuses on equity of output for schools according to race classes. People of a certain race don’t graduate college as much, therefore the problem must lie with the schools. There must be some ingrained injustice in the school institution, as race is a class and all classes are equal. He does not even admit the possibility of another reason, such as class culture or parents.

This follows the Marxist tactic of defining the individual in terms of their class. Marxists seek equity of outcome for all classes through cultural institutions such as college. He says the lack of Black graduates is a problem because we need to “increase America’s economic output.” Not because of the individuals, not because of morality, but because of economic output.

This is classic Marxist ideology. It is a zero sum fallacy. If some class performs better, that means another class is oppressed. If some people receive racism, that means other races are unjustly privileged. Although, it seems to be Whites who are privileged even though Asians perform better… because there are a variety of Asian races… and not Whites, apparently? This guy is all over the place.

The lack of women in the federal Senate must be because of sexism. They can play this game all day, cherry-pick inequalities that naturally occur while ignoring others. What about the lack of Whites in the NBA? What about the lack of Mormons in San Francisco? Marxists pick any fragment of evidence they can to push a narrative of class inequality.

By defining people in terms of class instead of individuals, the Marxists destroy a merit-based economy and personal agency. Suddenly we are lowering the standards for certain people to graduate college. Suddenly certain people get free handouts. By coddling the “minorities,” Marxists only enslave them in a cylce of dependency, because they no longer have personal agency.

This racist rhetoric is not confined to the lecture hall. It bleeds out into the college structure itself.

A local CBS News report declares students need teachers of their own race. They interview almost entire Black students, even though the school’s demographics are only 5% Black and 24% Hispanic.

This is the same narrative that leads to racial segregation in some schools. Marxists push racism and divide by race, oppressing Whites in the name of “equity.” Racial representation becomes a much higher representation of faculty than students of that minority class.

Accreditation In Jeopardy Due To Inept Leadership

After the City College of San Franisco lost its accreditation as a college, Diablo Valley college found itself next on the chopping block.

The commission had previously sanctioned Diablo’s accreditation because the school “had not resolved recommendations made by a visiting team, which involved decision making roles, curriculum and college wide planning within a two year time frame.”

The 2009 report pointed out that the college needed a “uniform process of program review which includes direct evidence of student learning and is used to inform and influence planning and resource allocation and leads to improvement in programs and services.” It found the school lacked “a timely, systematic review and efficient procedures for course and program approval with adequate technology and staff support.” It demanded better communication across organizations “by promoting transparent decision making, honest dialogue and widespread dissemination of internal college documents.”

Apparently these issues did get resolved with the accreditation board, but it just goes to show where the school’s priorities lie. It still has a low faculty to student ratio, which is certainly much more important to learning than the race of the instructors.

I am also curious why the school is allowed accreditation and receives federal tax dollars even though it shelters illegal aliens.

Seek Friendship to Improve Your Life and Their Life

In the Current Year friendship is watered down.  In the modern world the modern meaning of friendship has come to mean:

  • Hangout together
  • No expectations
  • “Acceptance”
  • Get together to dull the boredom of daily life

What we see is friendship has come to mean people who we spend time with to dull boredom in our daily lives who don’t expect us to be interesting and provide value; while we don’t expect them to be interesting or to provide value.

In the not so recent past friendship meant a combination of:

  • Mutual support
  • Alliance building
  • Enjoyment of common activities
  • Loyalty

Aristotle defined friendship as the mutual recognition of each other’s excellence and sharing each other’s values.  Historically friendship had a deeper meaning than it has today.  People were bound to their friends and were very loyal to each other.  People tended to keep their friends for their lives.

Modern friendships are very watered down and meaningless for most people.  People aren’t bound to their friends and they tend to move from friends to friends based on whatever is convenient for them.  People drop their friends over minor matters.  If you ever try to help one of your friends to live a better life, you will probably find that your friend suddenly hates you and doesn’t want to “hangout” with you anymore.

One of the best ways to improve your life is by choosing better friends.  Seek out friends who you see excellence in their lives.  When you make friends with people who are excellent and live the kind of life you want to live; you will find that you enjoy them more and you have more in common with them.  You will find that you have a better bond with them and your relationship lasts longer.

Once you identify and make great friends, next it is important to maintain your relationship.  Make sure to help them out whenever they need your support.  This means that you will probably have to help them move furniture.  When your friends are between jobs you will have to help pass their résumés around town to help your friends find a job.  The good news is when you help them out; they will help you out just as much.

The general rule to having good friends is you have to give them value and they have to give you value.  When you keep this rule in mind you will be able to choose great friends and you will know what you have to do to maintain your friendship.  Modern losers want to rope people into modern friendships where people don’t provide value to the relationship.  Never let people rope you into modern pathetic friendships.  As long as you choose friends who you can recognize their value and excellence and as long as you provide them value; you will have great friendships.

Read the first neomasculine book written for Mormons today


Virginity Rocks Guy Shows Us that Virtue Signaling Never Makes Your Life Better

(I’m going to rework and republish some of my favorite older Redgulls articles to share them with a wider audience).  One of the things that we often do in Mormon Culture is try to score brownie points and pats on the head for being good little Mormon boys and Mormons girls by virtue signaling in ridiculous ways.  One of the more annoying practices in Mormon Culture is trying to redefine our shortcomings into alternative forms of success.  It is very much a gamma male thing lots of Mormon guys do.  When it comes to using virtue signaling to create alternative forms of success Virginity Rocks guy takes the cake.  Check out the shirt Virginity Rocks guy was wearing:

The conservative version of virtue signaling to show how much of a special snowflake he is.

It’s a sad and depressing shirt for a man to wear around BYU-I.  We all know that the world tries to turn us into sexual degenerates who are obsessed with our cummies.  What makes Virginity Rocks guy’s shirt so tragic is he is playing into the world’s frame of “Hey you need to be out there having lots of promiscuous sex” by saying, “I’m not able to play your game, so I’m better than you.”  It’s a pure gamma male reaction where he tries to take a part of his life where he isn’t living up to how the world expects him to live and tries to redefine it as he’s really better in a secret way because . . ., reasons.

Virginity Rocks guy is trying to look like he’s superior and above it all but in reality he’s just humiliating himself.  I’m not going to show you his face but he has the typical smug look of a self righteous young man who thinks he is getting one over on the world.  However his very sad body language shows that underneath it all, he knows that nobody is buying what he’s selling.  Everything about Virginity Rocks virtue signally guy signals creepy, weird, self righteous chump.

This photo is depressing because Virginity Rocks virtue signaling guy is showing off that he is a pure gamma male that is playing by the world’s rules not Heavenly Father’s rules.  Heavenly Father wants us to obey the Law of Chastity because it is the best way for us to form happy marriages and live happy families.  The world wants us to be sexually promiscuous because that is the best way for men to get into bad relationships which make them miserable and the world wants women to be sexually promiscuous because promiscuity makes women unable to pair bond with their husbands which makes women miserable.   Wearing this shirt says that this young man plays by the world’s rules instead of playing by Heavenly Father’s rules.

By wearing his Virginity Rocks shirt this young man is acting just like how Jesus taught us to avoid acting in the Sermon on the Mount:

Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven.

Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men.  Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.  But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth:

That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly.  (Matthew 6:1-4).

By wearing his Virginity Rocks shirt this young man is saying that he wants good boy bonus points for obeying the commandments.  He wants the praise from his fellow students instead of earning praise from Heavenly Father.  Heavenly Father wants us to obey the commandment in our private lives not try to turn living the commandments into an attempt to virtue signal.

This young man’s Virginity Rocks shirt shows that he is the kind of LDS man who we all hate having to spend time with.  He’s the kind of guy who never passes up a chance to virtue signal and show that he is better than you are.  You know the guy, we’ve all had to suffer having guys like him in our ward.  He’s just like the guy who makes you feel guilty for not visiting all the inactive members of the ward on your home teaching list.  Mormon men like him make attending our weekly church meeting into a brutal ordeal instead of a time to be in communion with Heavenly Father and our local LDS community.

Why are virtue signaling men like Virginity Rocks guy worthy of shame and ridicule? One of life’s ugliest truths is double standards exist.  A pretty girl who stays a virgin until she marries is a virtuous young woman.  She has limitless sexual options and chooses to avoid them.  However an unattractive man who women don’t want, don’t get bonus points for obeying the Law of Chastity.  Does anybody think this guy could seduce an attractive girl?  Of course not!  It would be funny to watch the attempt.

The second reason why Virginity Rocks virtue signaling guy is worthy of shame is because he tries to make his failure in the dating market into an alternative form of victory.  He twists the meaning of the Law of Chastity from a code to keep us from having to deal with bad life consequences to a statement about him.  He tries to hold himself above life’s realities.  All men want to get laid but according to him, not him.   He wants a hot girl to see him in his Virginity Rocks shirt and say, “Wow he is morally superior.  He is different from all the other men that I meet.”  Of course we all know that he is just like the hordes of frustrated men in the world except he is too prideful to admit he struggles in the dating market.

The third reason why Virginity Rocks virtue signaling guy is worthy of shame and contempt is because he acts just like the hypocrites who announce to the whole world that they are fasting and doing alms.  He wants public adulation for obeying commandments, which he can’t break anyway.  He wants praise for obeying the commandments.  I bet he gets all kinds of praise for his life choices but none of the praise he receives leads to dates with pretty girls.

Fourth we know that Virginity Rocks virtue signaling guy would throw all of his supposed virtue away in a New York minute if he had the chance.  If we hired a really innocent looking prostitute to seduce him, and told her that she could take multiple evenings to seduce him but she only gets paid after she seduces him; how long would it take her to seduce him?  I bet she could seduce him on the first night.

The fifth reason why Virginity Rocks virtue signaling man is worthy of shame and contempt is because he is saying a lie.  Speaking as a recently married man, virginity doesn’t rock.  There’s nothing good and great about it.  Life is much better as a married man with a healthy sex life.  And everybody knows it.  He is trying to pass a lie on everybody else in the world and nobody is buying it.  It’s like those fat women wearing “hands off my pussy shirts.”

The feminist version of Virginity Rocks guy

Nobody is interested in grabbing them by the pussy and nobody wants Virginity Rocks virtue signally guy’s sex life.

The sixth and most important reason why Virginity Rocks virtue signaling guy is worthy of shame and contempt is because he broadcasts his biggest sin on his sleeve.  His biggest sin is pride.  He markets himself to the world as if he doesn’t have to conform to life’s realities.  His shirt makes the statement that he is such a special unique snowflake that he doesn’t have to obey the laws of nature.  His shirt indicates that he believes that he deserves added benefits for obeying the Gospel because he is just so special.  More than that, his shirt makes the statement that his obedience is better than other young men’s obedience because he is just so special.  He blatantly displays a major case of special snowflake syndrome.  The pride on display with his shirt is truly sickening.

As a man, never announce to the world your struggles because nobody cares about your struggles.  If you find yourself struggling to get a date don’t tell anybody about it.  When you find yourself struggling with anything don’t make a public demonstration about it.  Don’t try to turn your struggles into an alternative form of success like Virginity Rocks virtue signaling man.  And please don’t brag about it.  It just makes you look like a pathetic loser.

Never behave like Virginity Rocks virtue signaling guy.  If you obey God’s commandments do not go around demanding public rewards for your obedience.  Some people may give you a little bit of public praise but most people will give you private scorn.  Nobody likes a self righteous dolt who wants people to praise him for doing what he is supposed to do.  Virginity Rocks virtue signaling man is doing the religious conservative version of feminist men who wear vagina hats.  It’s just gross pathetic and laughable.

Liberal men doing their version of Virginity Rocks virtue signaling

Make sure to leave a comment on this article below.

Read the first neomasculine book written for Mormons today


The Spirit Told Me. . ., Always is False Revelation Fake Mormons Use to Manipulate You

In the Mormon community one of the biggest annoyances is we have lots of care bears who love to help us live our lives.  Whenever they want to manage our lives for us they tell us The Spirit told me. . ., and then tell you want they think that you should do with your life.  It’s a real annoyance and causes us lots of annoyance.  If you have a Mormon care bear in your life, hearing the Spirit told me this and that will drive you insane.

One of the things that many Mormons struggle with is the concept of personal revelation.  Many members of the church believe that just because they can receive guidance from the Lord that they can give other people guidance about their lives.  Unfortunately many Mormons will say that the “Spirit told me. . .,” and tell you something they want you to do with your life or tell you how they want you to run your organization.

Whenever somebody says that “the Spirit told me . . .,” you know that whatever they are telling you didn’t come from the Holy Ghost.  And here’s how you know that it’s B.S.

Heavenly Father has set up a precise line of authority on who can receive revelation on behalf of other people.

First of all we all have a right to receive personal revelation for our personal lives.  We have a right to have Heavenly Father guide us in our personal lives and help us make good decisions in our own lives.  All of Heavenly Father’s children have this right and Mormons get an extra dose of this support from the Gift of the Holy Ghost.

Next parents have a right to receive revelation to help them guide their children and the husband has a right to receive revelation to guide the whole family.  In the Mormon Church there is a hierarchy for revelation.  Bishops have the right to receive revelation for their ward, stake presidents have the right to receive revelation for the stake and this authority continues all the way up to the top of the Mormon Church where the prophet and only the prophet has the authority for the whole church.

In the Mormon Church there’s a strict line of authority for who has a right to receive guidance for other people and if somebody isn’t in the line of authority then that person doesn’t have a right to receive that revelation.  If somebody doesn’t have the right to receive inspiration and guidance for you then when they tell you “The Spirit told me . . .,” you know that their inspiration didn’t come from Heavenly Father.

For example when Mrs. Johnson and I were about to get married several of her college friends and roommates flew into town.  One of them is the kind of girl who goes around trying to ruin the relationships of her “friends.”  After a few days this girl told Mrs. Johnson that the Spirit told her that Mrs. Johnson shouldn’t marry me.  So how did Mrs. Johnson know that her “friend” was full of crap besides the obvious that her “friend” was only in town to try to cause chaos?

Well simply put when the “friend” told Mrs. Johnson that the Spirit told her to tell Mrs. Johnson that she shouldn’t marry me was a sign that that girl was full of crap.  She didn’t have authority to receive revelation help guide Mrs. Johnson.  She wasn’t a parent or the prophet or anything.  She was just a girl who lived with Mrs. Johnson for a semester.  She didn’t have any claim to a right for the Holy Ghost to guide her.  Even if Mrs. Johnson didn’t already know that her “friend” was full of crap and only came to the wedding to try to cause chaos and try to torpedo the wedding, her “friend” saying, “The Spirit told me that you shouldn’t marry Jeffrey” was proof that she was full of crap.

The second way that you know when somebody says that the Spirit told them that you should do something is the nature of saying the Spirit told me.  In D&C 121:36-39 we learn that we are never permitted to say that our authority gives us the right to say that they must act how we want them to act:

36 That the rights of the priesthood are inseparably connected with the powers of heaven, and that the powers of heaven cannot be controlled nor handled only upon the principles of righteousness.

37 That they may be conferred upon us, it is true; but when we undertake to cover our sins, or to gratify our pride, our vain ambition, or to exercise control or dominion or compulsion upon the souls of the children of men, in any degree of unrighteousness, behold, the heavens withdraw themselves; the Spirit of the Lord is grieved; and when it is withdrawn, Amen to the priesthood or the authority of that man.

38 Behold, ere he is aware, he is left unto himself, to kick against the pricks, to persecute the saints, and to fight against God.

39 We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous dominion.  (D&C 121:36-39).

If we receive revelation for how we are supposed to guide groups or people under our spiritual jurisdiction then we can’t go and tell them that the Spirit told us what they are supposed to do.  We are supposed to persuade them to do it and help them understand why they want to do what the Holy Ghost told us how things are supposed to be.  We never have the right to say that we have the authority to say how things are supposed to be and that people are supposed to obey us just because.

The statement “the Spirit told me . . .,” always is false for 2 reasons.  The Spirit told me. . ., is false because whenever somebody who doesn’t have authority to receive revelation for us says it, then we know that whatever revelation or inspiration that they think they got for us didn’t come from the Holy Ghost.  If the person saying “The Spirit told me. . .,” has authority to receive guidance in our lives or church callings then the person saying “The Spirit told me,” and then tells you what he wants you to do just because; then you know that he is using unjust dominion and is full of crap.  Whenever anybody tells you the Spirit told me . . ., run.

Make sure to leave a comment on this article below.

Read the first neomasculine book written for Mormons today